A recent report from The Hollywood Reporter offers that Daisy Ridley is the future of the Star Wars franchise, but Iâm calling that complete bullshit.
The fact is, if Daisy Ridley was the future of Star Wars, we would already have had a new Daisy Ridley Star Wars movie.
The fact is, if Daisy Ridley was the future of Star Wars, the franchise wouldnât have gone on a 5+ year hiatus (just like I first said it would).
The fact is, if Daisy Ridley was the future of Star Wars, her Sharmeen Obaid-Chinoy movie that is âsupposedâ to come out wouldnât be in development hell.
Update: Disney has yanked the 2026 release date.

Lucasfilm press release: We want Rey back to save our jobs!
The article at THR is laughable because it reads like a press release put out by Daisy Ridleyâs talent manager, her PR team, and the bozos at Lucasfilm who have ruined Star Wars and are now scrambling to save their jobs.
This includes Kathleen Kennedy, who everyone hopes will be out the door by the time Bob Iger exits in 2026 (though her exit should have happened much sooner).
What the article is trying to do is convince fans that suck up everything â like the Star Wars Redditor bozos â that Daisy Ridley and Rey âSkywalkerâ are the most âcovetedâ thing in the Star Wars movie âarsenal.â Itâs a puff piece trying to convince clueless exes at Disney that Rey is the future of Star Wars.
Itâs hilarious. Sheâs not.

âRey Skywalkerâ is not the future of Star Wars
Daisy Ridley and âRey Skywalkerâ are actually the epitome of everything fans despise about Disney, Lucasfilm, Kennedy, and Star Wars.
She symbolizes the destruction of George Lucasâ two trilogies and the undermining of 40 yearsâ worth of storytelling.
Under âRey Skywalker,â fans witnessed Han Soloâs death, were denied a reunion of the original cast, never got to see Master Luke truly take charge, and faced the biggest FU of allâthe trilogyâs âvillainâ ultimately identifying as the âhero.â
Youâll note the article was published after news broke that Simon Kinberg is developing a new Star Wars Trilogy (note: Captain Marvel ruined X-Men: Dark Phoenix).
Details are slim, but I am betting itâs minus Daisy Ridley and Rey and will feature a male protagonist (thank you, Trump!). The article also also follows Ridley being announced on a new Martin Campbell non-Star Wars movie â so when exactly is Ridley supposed to do that Sharmeen Obaid-Chinoy Star Wars???

Rey/Ridley shills in full force
THRâs article notes that the Kinberg Star Wars trilogy is âon a collision course with the Rey stand-alone movieâ and includes quotes from someone obviously in Ridleyâs camp, again trying to convince execs and fans to stick with Rey: âShe is the most valuable cinematic asset, in some ways maybe the only one, Star Wars has right now.â
Another: âRey is set to play a role in several movies that are being developed, although which ones remains unclear.â
Another: âRey, created in the post-Lucas era, is arguably the only entity with currency on the big screen now. âThe closet is a little bare.ââ

Lucasfilm is completely clueless â correct
The article continues and does get things right, as âsourcesâ offer Lucasfilm is completely clueless.
âYouâre being asked to create the new New Testament,â said a source THR claims to have worked on previous movies. âAnd no one can agree on anything and thereâs a lot of second-guessing about meanings.â
Another source actually explains â without saying it â why continuing with Daisy Ridley as Rey wonât work: âStar Wars is a nostalgia-based enterprise, and they are running out of ways to create nostalgia.â
The fact is, there is no nostalgia with Rey. They blew it with the Disney Trilogy by not correctly passing the baton. They also blew it by not developing characters and characters that had potential were cast to the side (sorry, John Boyega!).
âTo make stand-alone movies or continuing the Skywalker Saga in any form is a fundamental question the company faces as it tries to move forward,â says a source for THR.
If by continuing the âSkywalker Sagaâ you mean Daisey Ridley as Rey â yep! we donât want it!
