As Kathleen Kennedy exits Lucasfilm, sheâs pointing to fans as the source of Star Warsâ biggest âlows.â
In her Deadline exit interview, when asked about the Star Wars highs and lows, Kennedy responded about the lows and claimed that only a âvery, very small percentageâ of the Star Wars fanbase caused the backlash that defined much of her tenure.
According to Kennedy, these fans simply wanted âthe same thingâ and were impossible to satisfy if Lucasfilm chose to go in new creative directions.
âThe lows are that youâve got a very, very small percentage of the fan base that has enormous expectations,â Kennedy said, adding that she wouldnât change any of the creative decisions she made while running the studio.

A âSmallâ Group That Shut Down Star Wars for Years
However, Kennedyâs comments immediately raise a credibility problem.
If the backlash truly came from a tiny minority, itâs hard to explain why Star Wars effectively disappeared from theaters for seven years after The Rise of Skywalker.
It also doesnât explain why Lucasfilm reduced budgets and content on Disney+.
Disney didnât pause theatrical releases and reduce content because of a fringe audience. The hiatus followed declining box office returns, stalled projects, and sustained audience pushback from a majority of fans.
Studios donât freeze billionâdollar franchises because of a small number of loud voices online.

The Last Jedi Contradiction
Kennedyâs own interview also undercuts her argument.
Later in the same conversation, she admitted that the reaction to The Last Jedi played a major role in driving Rian Johnson away from Star Wars.
Despite The Last Jedi earning $1.3 billion worldwide, Kennedy said Johnson was âspookedâ by online negativity after the filmâs release.
If the backlash was insignificant, why did it derail Johnsonâs planned return to the franchise?
That admission suggests the criticism had real consequencesâimpacting filmmakers, future projects, and Lucasfilmâs longâterm plans.
Or how about she even admits she put Alden Ehrenreich in an âimpossible situationâ to play Han Solo?

Kennedy Points to Misogyny and Bots
Of course, Kennedy also suggested that online harassmentâparticularly toward womenâhas played a major role in shaping the climate around Star Wars.
She said she gives female filmmakers a heads-up when they join the franchise:
âIâm honest, especially with the women that come into this space because they unfairly get targeted. I donât try to sugarcoat it. And I emphasize that itâs a very small group of people, with loud megaphones. I truly do not believe that itâs the majority of the fans. And I think weâre also in this weird world of where bots can affect things. You have to develop a tough skin. That is exactly right. Thatâs what you have to do. You canât make it go away.â
Instead of acknowledging widespread dissatisfaction with projects like The Last Jedi, The Rise of Skywalker, or The Book of Boba Fett, Kennedy shifts the blame from herself and reduces the issue to trolls and bots.
Itâs clear her âForce is Femaleâ agenda didnât work out, but that is the fault of the fans, right?

A Narrative That No Longer Holds
By blaming a âsmallâ segment of the audience while simultaneously acknowledging that backlash reshaped Star Warsâ creative future, Kennedyâs exit comments feel at odds with reality.
Star Wars didnât stumble because fans expected too much; on the contrary, fans expected the bare minimum â something Mark Hamill recently addressed â which Kennedy didnât deliver.
Under Kennedy, Star Wars stumbled because Lucasfilm didnât respect the fans or the material.
As Dave Filoni takes over, the bigger question isnât whether Star Wars can survive vocal fans. Itâs whether Lucasfilm can rebuild trust with the audience it once took for granted.
